From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Tue May 08 2007 - 04:48:09 CDT
At 10:26 +0100 2007-05-08, Richard Wordingham wrote:
>Are you suggesting <U+00DF LATIN SMALL LETTER SHARP S, U+FE00
>VARIATION SELECTOR-1>? If CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S were rejected as a
>glyph variant of SMALL LETTER SHARP S, there would be a case for
>this combination, loathsome as several will find it.
I am happy to be the first to reject it as loathsome.
Capital letters are not "variants" of small letters in this sense.
-- Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 08 2007 - 04:54:29 CDT