Re: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue May 08 2007 - 04:48:09 CDT

Next message: Johannes Bergerhausen: "Re: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"
In reply to: Richard Wordingham: "Re: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Uppercase ÃŸ is coming? (U+1E9E)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 10:26 +0100 2007-05-08, Richard Wordingham wrote:

>Are you suggesting <U+00DF LATIN SMALL LETTER SHARP S, U+FE00
>VARIATION SELECTOR-1>? If CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S were rejected as a
>glyph variant of SMALL LETTER SHARP S, there would be a case for
>this combination, loathsome as several will find it.

I am happy to be the first to reject it as loathsome.

Capital letters are not "variants" of small letters in this sense.

-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Johannes Bergerhausen: "Re: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"
In reply to: Richard Wordingham: "Re: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Uppercase ÃŸ is coming? (U+1E9E)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 08 2007 - 04:54:29 CDT