From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu May 10 2007 - 12:21:53 CDT
At 10:04 -0700 2007-05-10, Asmus Freytag wrote:
>>Your idea is fine, but at the end of the day it falls to me to draw
>>the glyph that goes in the charts, and it is expected to harmonize
>>with the rest of the glyphs. And the UCS is an International
>>Standard, not just a DIN standard.
>At the end of the day, you may be the one supplying the actual
>outline, but it falls to the community to settle the overall
>features of what would be a proper Times-like design appropriate for
>the code charts.
I did not say otherwise.
>I read your statement not as claiming ownership, but to remind
>people that the decision for the representative glyph has to be
>settled way before wide-spread implementations of this glyph become
>available (excepting the pre-existing fonts here for a moment).
That is why I have made many glyphs and asked for feedback.
-- Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 10 2007 - 12:25:42 CDT