From: Peter Constable (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Jul 11 2007 - 12:04:39 CDT
From: James Kass [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Since the AUMS font has CJK ideographs, and the Sylfaen
> font doesn't, might a working theory be that Word 2000
> is only applying CJK logic when a font covering CJK is
> in use?
Quite possibly. I'm not sure of the details of its logic.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 11 2007 - 12:10:33 CDT