Re: Composition of not included Chinese characters

From: John H. Jenkins (
Date: Mon Sep 24 2007 - 17:28:56 CDT

  • Next message: William J Poser: "Re: Composition of not included Chinese characters"

    On Sep 24, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:

    > Unfortunately, this is not a legitimate IDS. On p. 427 (
    > ), the Standard states that no legitimate IDS can contain more than
    > 16 Unicode code points, but yours contains 18. A silly restriction,
    > to be sure, but that's the way the Standard is currently written.
    > So I guess at the moment there's no way to represent this character
    > in legitimate Unicode?

    Evidently not. Fortunately, I don't think this particular IDS is
    going to break anything. :-)

    John H. Jenkins

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 24 2007 - 17:31:12 CDT