From: John H. Jenkins (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Sep 24 2007 - 17:28:56 CDT
On Sep 24, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> Unfortunately, this is not a legitimate IDS. On p. 427 ( http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode5.0.0/ch12.pdf
> ), the Standard states that no legitimate IDS can contain more than
> 16 Unicode code points, but yours contains 18. A silly restriction,
> to be sure, but that's the way the Standard is currently written.
> So I guess at the moment there's no way to represent this character
> in legitimate Unicode?
Evidently not. Fortunately, I don't think this particular IDS is
going to break anything. :-)
John H. Jenkins
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 24 2007 - 17:31:12 CDT