From: John H. Jenkins (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Oct 30 2007 - 15:32:01 CST
On Oct 30, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Ben Monroe wrote:
> Yes, my surname.
> I mentioned it around March 2002 on this list.
> You may find it in L2/07-161 (Index UTC00119) and the status is "Not
> to encode".
First of all, this character wasn't "rejected" per se, and certainly
not by the IRG.
The "not to encode" status is supposed to mean that either it's
already encoded or is a variant of an already encoded variant. (Not
necessarily a unifiable variant, BTW.) I have an action item to wrap
all of the variants into a registered variant set under UTS 37.
However, in this case I'm left scratching my head. This should not
have the "not to encode" status. I don't know how that happened, but
it was a mistake, and I've altered the status to reflect this.
John H. Jenkins
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 30 2007 - 15:33:51 CST