From: John H. Jenkins (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Oct 30 2007 - 16:41:46 CST
On Oct 30, 2007, at 3:32 PM, John H. Jenkins wrote:
> The "not to encode" status is supposed to mean that either it's
> already encoded or is a variant of an already encoded variant. (Not
> necessarily a unifiable variant, BTW.) I have an action item to
> wrap all of the variants into a registered variant set under UTS 37.
Actually, a slight correction. There are two characters in the UTC
set which have the "not to encode" status for another reason:
UTC00118 and UTC00326. The former is, essentially, a dingbat
occurring in some of the novels by Orson Scott Card, and the latter is
my standard dummy character used to illustrate the compositional
nature of the Han script.
John H. Jenkins
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 30 2007 - 16:43:33 CST