RE: logos, symbols, and ligatures (RE: Encoding Personal Use Ideographs)

From: Kent Karlsson (kent.karlsson14@comhem.se)
Date: Sun Nov 04 2007 - 16:00:20 CST

  • Next message: Kent Karlsson: "RE: logos, symbols, and ligatures (RE: Encoding Personal Use Ideographs)"

    John H. Jenkins wrote:
    > I really doubt that the UTC would ever consent to encoding additional
    > Latin ligatures any more than it would encode additional precomposed
    > accented Latin letters. The ones that we have are present in the
    > standard for the sole purpose of providing round-trip compatibility
    > with older standards (e.g., MacRoman).

    And yet the UTC, as well as WG2, seems to be in the process of adopting 100+
    Hangul Jamo that are aren't even ligature-like, but each just represents a sequence
    of Hangul conjoining letters.

                    /kent k



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 04 2007 - 16:01:59 CST