From: Kent Karlsson (kent.karlsson14@comhem.se)
Date: Sun Nov 04 2007 - 16:00:20 CST
John H. Jenkins wrote:
> I really doubt that the UTC would ever consent to encoding additional
> Latin ligatures any more than it would encode additional precomposed
> accented Latin letters. The ones that we have are present in the
> standard for the sole purpose of providing round-trip compatibility
> with older standards (e.g., MacRoman).
And yet the UTC, as well as WG2, seems to be in the process of adopting 100+
Hangul Jamo that are aren't even ligature-like, but each just represents a sequence
of Hangul conjoining letters.
/kent k
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 04 2007 - 16:01:59 CST