From: James Kass (thunder-bird@earthlink.net)
Date: Mon Nov 05 2007 - 18:32:47 CST
John H. Jenkins wrote,
> Yes. There are several problems. A FAQ has just been added to the
> Unicode Web site to call attention to them <http://www.unicode.org/faq/han_cjk.html#24
Thank you for the new FAQ concerning why a compositional
model for CJK encoding is unwelcome.
"Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done
and why. Then do it." (Robert Heinlein)
Although the pitfalls are well-known, solutions exist.
Meanwhile, what is the official position concerning ideographic
description sequences (and possible glyph generation from same)
for representing unlikely-to-ever-be-encoded personal ideographs
in plain text?
Best regards,
James Kass
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 05 2007 - 18:35:19 CST