From: James Kass (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Nov 05 2007 - 21:08:49 CST
Kenneth Whistler wrote,
>> Meanwhile, what is the official position concerning ideographic
>> description sequences (and possible glyph generation from same)
>> for representing unlikely-to-ever-be-encoded personal ideographs
>> in plain text?
> There is no "official position". If you must have one, then
> I'd suggest submitting a proposal asking the UTC to go on
> record with an official position. Just be careful -- you
> might get what you are asking for: an "official position".
The concern is that an approach will be implemented and
publicized. Five years down the road, a FAQ will appear
forbidding the practice. This may seem a little far-fetched,
but stranger things have happened.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 05 2007 - 21:11:05 CST