From: James Kass (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Nov 23 2007 - 07:31:07 CST
Is there a typo in the names for OL CHIKI?
1C78 ᱸ OL CHIKI MU TTUDDAG
1C79 ᱹ OL CHIKI GAAHLAA TTUDDAAG
1C7A ᱺ OL CHIKI MU-GAAHLAA TTUDDAAG
Should U+1C78 be TTUDDAAG like 1C79 and 1C7A?
N2984.PDF also shows TTUDDAG for 1C78.
Searching the file N2984.PDF shows five instances of "TTUDDAG"
and eleven instances of "TTUDDAAG". The name of U+1C79 is
OL CHIKI GAAHLAA TTUDDAAG, but in the text it also appears
as both GAAHLAA TTUDDAAG and as GAAHLAA TTUDDAG.
Quoting from N2984.PDF,
"The vowel modifier <©> GAAHLAA TTUDDAAG 1C79 (åè©ñéè©
§ô†è©å) ga˘hla˘ t.ud. a˘g [g´hl´Tu∂´k’] follows ä 1C5A a, è 1C5F a¯ ,
and û 1C6F e. In the sources consulted, I have found all three:
ä© o˘ [O] , è© a˘ [´] , and û© e˘ [E] ."
Well, copy/pasting didn't work out so well, but it appears, based
on the Ol Chiki words in the text, that U+1C78 should be named
OL CHIKI MU TTUDDAAG.
P.S.: Re-typing the above quotation gives us:
“The vowel modifier <ᱹ> GAAHLAA TTUDDAAG 1C79 (ᱜᱟᱹᱦᱞᱟᱹ
ᱴᱩᱰᱟᱹᱜ) găhlă ṭuḍăg [ɡəhlə ʈuɖəkʼ] follows ᱚ 1C5A a, ᱟ 1C5F ā,
and ᱯ 1C6F e. In the sources consulted, I have found all three:
ᱚᱹ ŏ [ɔ] , ᱟᱹ ă [ə] , and ᱮᱹ ĕ [ɛ] .”
(Note that 1C6F in the quoted paragraph and its associated
glyph should probably be U+1C6E ᱮ OL CHIKI LETTER LE.)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 23 2007 - 07:33:22 CST