From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Dec 07 2007 - 18:28:58 CST
Kenneth Whistler <kenw at sybase dot com> wrote:
> I'd wager that *most* major implementers have already started to use
> Unicode 5.1 code points in internal development of projected software
> releases, and some of that is going to start leaking out publicly well
> before the checkered flag on March 31.
I sure hope so. I'm really tired of using "modern" software that claims
conformance to Unicode 2.x or 3.x.
-- Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://home.roadrunner.com/~dewell http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ "Valid characters may be 8-bit ASCII, or ISO Latin-1 Unicode." -- constraints on sequential file names in Caché ObjectScript
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 07 2007 - 18:31:48 CST