**From:** Doug Ewell (*dewell@roadrunner.com*)

**Date:** Fri Dec 07 2007 - 18:28:58 CST

**Previous message:**Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Miscellaneous Mathematical Symbols-A"**In reply to:**Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Miscellaneous Mathematical Symbols-A"**Next in thread:**Peter Constable: "RE: Miscellaneous Mathematical Symbols-A"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]**Mail actions:**[ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Kenneth Whistler <kenw at sybase dot com> wrote:

*> I'd wager that *most* major implementers have already started to use
*

*> Unicode 5.1 code points in internal development of projected software
*

*> releases, and some of that is going to start leaking out publicly well
*

*> before the checkered flag on March 31.
*

I sure hope so. I'm really tired of using "modern" software that claims

conformance to Unicode 2.x or 3.x.

-- Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://home.roadrunner.com/~dewell http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ "Valid characters may be 8-bit ASCII, or ISO Latin-1 Unicode." -- constraints on sequential file names in Caché ObjectScript

**Next message:**James Kass: "Re: Vai character use?"**Previous message:**Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Miscellaneous Mathematical Symbols-A"**In reply to:**Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Miscellaneous Mathematical Symbols-A"**Next in thread:**Peter Constable: "RE: Miscellaneous Mathematical Symbols-A"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]**Mail actions:**[ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Fri Dec 07 2007 - 18:31:48 CST
*