From: Peter Constable (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Dec 08 2007 - 10:45:40 CST
> From: Kent Karlsson [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> > I'm surprised you'd think that changing the
> > mirroring property of these characters would be a good move.
> 1) These characters were relatively recently encoded in Unicode,
> and there is likely not very many documents using the ornate
> parentheses in a Unicode encoding. Furthermore, they are not
> present in commonly used non-Unicode encodings.
FBD3..FD3F ; 1.1 #  ARABIC LETTER NG ISOLATED FORM..ORNATE RIGHT PARENTHESIS
Do you really consider TUS1.1 to be relatively recent?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Dec 08 2007 - 10:48:50 CST