Re: The Geejay

From: David Starner (prosfilaes@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jan 04 2008 - 20:01:49 CST

  • Next message: John Hudson: "Re: chairless hamza"

    On Jan 4, 2008 1:16 PM, Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
    > In principle there are three choices (but not all of them may be
    > available), and not all of them are equally desirable.
    >
    > 1) If the character is unquestionably already encoded, pick a different,
    > but available glyph variant for it
    > 2) Pick a different character, but one that is used for the same purpose
    > elsewhere (e.g. an IPA or UPA character).
    > 3) Pick something that is unrelated but looks close.

    I think you missed an important one

    4) Pick something that unambigiously identifies the character; e.g.
    this character could be marked [Gj] or {Gj}, provided the brackets
    weren't used elsewhere in the text.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 04 2008 - 20:03:29 CST