From: arno (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Jan 05 2008 - 05:15:11 CST
Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:05:08AM +0100, arno wrote:
>> Again: the only possible reason not to do it, is: The present dividing
>> behaviour is asked for by an other language written with the Arabic script.
>> In that case U+0621 should be depreciated for the Arabic language as is
>> ARABIC LETTER HIGH HAMZA (U+0674) and the new hamza should be named 'ARABIC
>> LETTER ARABIC HAMZA'
> I've been told that a previous proposal to change the properties of
> U+0621 was met by resistance from Persian people claiming that it will
> break existing text where hamza is supposed to disjoin dual joining
Maybe Roozbeh Pournader could help.
Or anybody with some idea of Persian!
Or are all experts on the bidi list only?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 05 2008 - 05:17:25 CST