From: Khaled Hosny (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Jan 05 2008 - 04:51:23 CST
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:05:08AM +0100, arno wrote:
> Again: the only possible reason not to do it, is: The present dividing
> behaviour is asked for by an other language written with the Arabic script.
> In that case U+0621 should be depreciated for the Arabic language as is
> ARABIC LETTER HIGH HAMZA (U+0674) and the new hamza should be named 'ARABIC
> LETTER ARABIC HAMZA'
I've been told that a previous proposal to change the properties of
U+0621 was met by resistance from Persian people claiming that it will
break existing text where hamza is supposed to disjoin dual joining
-- Khaled Hosny
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 05 2008 - 04:54:17 CST