From: James Kass (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Feb 11 2008 - 14:36:31 CST
John Hudson wrote,
> Yes, canonical ordering would invert the display of the marks, so that the dot is
> positioned below the double diacritic. In order to prevent this, the user would need to
> insert CGJ between the two marks.
Kent Karlsson called this an "ugly hack". CGJ is canonical
combining class zero and a default ignorable code point.
Does this mean that canonical ordering may ignore the
CGJ and break the desired mark ordering anyway?
What about OpenType GPOS look-ups? Would the CGJ break
any mark-to-mark positioning?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 11 2008 - 14:38:02 CST