From: Andrew West (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Apr 09 2008 - 04:19:48 CDT
On 09/04/2008, Asmus Freytag <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> However, GB13000 has a scheme whereby any future codepoints in Unicode/10646
> are mapped into to the GB codespace algorithmically. That would tend to make
> the alignment of future additions rather automatic. Also, the salient point
> about GB13000 is the byte sequence, not the code point. In that sense, it's
> rather similar to a UTF.
Are you sure? This sounds like a description of GB18030 rather than GB13000.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 04:23:30 CDT