Re: Character found in national standard not defined in Unicode?

• Previous message: Stephane Bortzmeyer: "Re: Character found in national standard not defined in Unicode?"
• In reply to: André Szabolcs Szelp: "Character found in national standard not defined in Unicode?"
• Next in thread: André Szabolcs Szelp: "Re: Character found in national standard not defined in Unicode?"
• Reply: André Szabolcs Szelp: "Re: Character found in national standard not defined in Unicode?"
• Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Solar symbol in ARMSCI standard not defined in Unicode? Is it same as Georgian Borjgaly ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:49 AM, André Szabolcs Szelp
<a.sz.szelp@gmail.com> wrote:

> (I indeed did not find the character in the Armenian block, but it
> could hide somewhere among the dingbats (but if so without an
> annotation saying "eternity sign")).

There isn't an exact match, but something in the U+274x range can
serve as a good approximation.

Leo

• Next message: Rick McGowan: "IUC 32 abstract submission deadline - final reminder"
• Previous message: Stephane Bortzmeyer: "Re: Character found in national standard not defined in Unicode?"
• In reply to: André Szabolcs Szelp: "Character found in national standard not defined in Unicode?"
• Next in thread: André Szabolcs Szelp: "Re: Character found in national standard not defined in Unicode?"
• Reply: André Szabolcs Szelp: "Re: Character found in national standard not defined in Unicode?"
• Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Solar symbol in ARMSCI standard not defined in Unicode? Is it same as Georgian Borjgaly ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 24 2008 - 10:53:38 CDT