From: David Starner (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Jun 30 2008 - 18:43:25 CDT
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Leo Broukhis <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Isn't the letter in question the same as the rejected (in 2004)
> LATIN CAPITAL LETTER DOUBLE S
> (existence as character not demonstrated; would cause casing problems
> for legacy German data)?
Yes. I wish I could offer you a link to the proposal, but there was a
new one made, and it offered more than enough evidence to sustain it
as a letter. Apparently Unicode decided that the concerns of casing
problems were sufficiently dealt by not having the current double s
uppercase to it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 30 2008 - 18:45:57 CDT