Re: UTF-16 clarification needed

From: Doug Ewell (
Date: Fri Jul 04 2008 - 13:02:05 CDT

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: UTF-16 clarification needed"

    Philippe Verdy <verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr> wrote:

    >> They are both UTF-16 code units and code points. They are not
    >> Unicode scalar values.
    > I don't think it is correct to say that U+20045 (both a character and
    > a code point with scalar value hex 20045) will be created as U+D840
    > U+DC45 with UTF-16; the latter indicates TWO separate TWO separate
    > codepoints instead of one, assigned to TWO distinct NON-characters...

    I took this straight out of the definitions in the TUS 5.0 book.

    Doug Ewell  *  Arvada, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14  ˆ

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jul 04 2008 - 13:04:33 CDT