Re: UTF-16 clarification needed

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@roadrunner.com)
Date: Fri Jul 04 2008 - 13:16:50 CDT

Next message: Ngwe Tun: "wikipedia unicode font."

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: UTF-16 clarification needed"
In reply to: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven: "Re: UTF-16 clarification needed"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: UTF-16 clarification needed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai at in dash nomine dot org> wrote:

> OK, and when you have them together in a surrogate pair, do you call
> it a pair of code units or can you also call them a pair of code
> points?

Check Section 3.8, "Surrogates," on pages 97-98 of The Unicode Standard
5.0, available online at:

http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode5.0.0/ch03.pdf

Then check Unicode 5.1.0, available online at:

http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode5.1.0/

for any changes that may have occurred since the book was published.

Finally, you should cross-check all of this with Philippe Verdy to
ensure accuracy.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Arvada, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ

Next message: Ngwe Tun: "wikipedia unicode font."
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: UTF-16 clarification needed"
In reply to: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven: "Re: UTF-16 clarification needed"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: UTF-16 clarification needed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jul 04 2008 - 13:19:40 CDT