From: Hosszu Gabor (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Nov 04 2008 - 09:10:29 CST
I agree with you and I also welcome your balanced view that is seen on the
expression "Old/Sekler-Hungarian". I do not know your customs that is
why I did not change the thread.
The Community of the Hungarian Rovas Writers prefers the name
"Szekler-Hungarian Rovas script" to the "Old Hungarian script" since the
(1) Rovas writing was never extinct and (2) the "Old Hungarian" is not
specific for the Rovas (in the Middle Ages there was old Hungarian
scripting in Latin letters, too).
Dr. Gabor Hosszu, Ph.D., Assoc. Prof.
Dept. of Electron Devices, BME
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Doug Ewell wrote:
> Q: Why is this thread like boustrophedon itself?
> A: Because it goes in two different directions.
> It would be really neato if we could split the "principles of boustrophedon"
> discussion off into a separate thread, called, oh, I don't know, maybe "Re:
> Boustrophedon", and leave the present Subject line for discussions that
> really do have to do with Old/Szekler Hungarian.
> Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 04 2008 - 09:06:02 CST