Re: Why people still want to encode precomposed letters

From: Raymond Mercier (rm459@cam.ac.uk)
Date: Sun Nov 16 2008 - 04:49:00 CST

Next message: Don Osborn: "RE: Why people still want to encode precomposed letters"

Previous message: Julian Bradfield: "Re: Why people still want to encode precomposed letters"
Maybe in reply to: Karl Pentzlin: "Why people still want to encode precomposed letters"
Next in thread: abysta@yandex.ru: "Re: Why people still want to encode precomposed letters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Andrew wrote
>>This just seems to be a case of not having an appropriate font installed.
Of course if you have an appropriate font it works, but my remark just took the example of Doulos SIL, which was designed to cope with combining diacritics, and yet even that font turns out to work with only some of its characters. It just seemed to me that your remark was rather complacent.

Raymond

Next message: Don Osborn: "RE: Why people still want to encode precomposed letters"
Previous message: Julian Bradfield: "Re: Why people still want to encode precomposed letters"
Maybe in reply to: Karl Pentzlin: "Why people still want to encode precomposed letters"
Next in thread: abysta@yandex.ru: "Re: Why people still want to encode precomposed letters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 16 2008 - 04:51:20 CST