Date: Thu Nov 20 2008 - 22:40:09 CST
Quoting "John H. Jenkins" <email@example.com>:
> On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:34 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>> Actually it would be wrong to say that the newer characters are
>> all more and more obsurce. They are characters not in the larger
> Actually, with two exceptions, all of the characters the UTC is
> proposing for Extension D *are* in large, standard dictionaries.
I should be more exact in my wording. I was here refering to the big 4
dictionaries, which IMHO contain some pretty obscure characters, and
and outstanding characters where encoded in Extension B (apart from a
number of characters missed out by mistake), and the presence of some
relatively not so obscure characters yet to be encoded.
> John H. Jenkins
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 20 2008 - 22:44:16 CST