Date: Sat Jan 03 2009 - 09:52:40 CST
Quoting "David Starner" <email@example.com>:
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Ruszlan Gaszanov <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I wonder if anyone would actually use emoji in their search
>> queries. There are many other PUA applications (e.g. ConScript,
>> MUFI, TUNE etc.) that people *might* actually want to use in search
>> queries, yet UTC does not seems to care very much about that.
> How can you claim that? Everything in TUNE is already in Unicode, and
> proposals for significant parts of both MUFI and ConScript (Shavian,
> Deseret) have already been encoded.
Inclusion of a character in UCS does not guarantee that it will be
included in searches for example Ideographic Description Characters,
U+2ff0 to U+2ffb, are ignored by search engines.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 03 2009 - 09:55:37 CST