From: James Kass (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Jan 03 2009 - 19:34:27 CST
>Asmus Freytag wrote,
>>> These aren't compatibility characters unless the book definition
>>> in 5.0 has been trashed/revised.
>>See my reply to Everson.
>I'll check the archives, your reply to Michael Everson does
>not seem to have arrived here. Guess one of my previous
>responses to you about compatibility didn't get archived
>by the list or distributed, as well.
A check of the Unicode mail list archives finds no post
from you to Michael Everson so far this year.
Due to apparent problems with e-mail distribution, I will
be dropping my normal practice of fiddling with the "To:"
and "cc:" fields for the duration. Sorry if this means
some of you will sometimes get two copies of my posts.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 03 2009 - 19:36:24 CST