Re: Emoji-- all or nothing?

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Tue Jan 06 2009 - 06:13:02 CST

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Emoji and Search Engines"

    On 6 Jan 2009, at 06:37, John Hudson wrote:

    > One might object that this means any emoji character would require
    > four bytes instead of two, but that is also true if Unicode
    > surrogate characters are used, and opposition to encoding emoji
    > within the BMP seems stiffer than opposition to encoding them per se.

    I'm not sure I even want them in the SMP. I'm thinking Plane 14, at
    least for the dodgier ones.

    Michael Everson *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 06 2009 - 06:15:10 CST