From: Asmus Freytag (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jan 06 2009 - 13:46:11 CST
On 1/6/2009 4:13 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
> On 6 Jan 2009, at 06:37, John Hudson wrote:
>> One might object that this means any emoji character would require
>> four bytes instead of two, but that is also true if Unicode surrogate
>> characters are used, and opposition to encoding emoji within the BMP
>> seems stiffer than opposition to encoding them per se.
> I'm not sure I even want them in the SMP. I'm thinking Plane 14, at
> least for the dodgier ones.
Some people have made it clear they prefer plane 15 :-)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 06 2009 - 13:47:35 CST