From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jan 06 2009 - 19:29:08 CST
Asmus Freytag <asmusf at ix dot netcom dot com> wrote:
> Extending the existing list of "icons" in Unicode is not the dramatic
> step that you and other have made it out to be. Yes, doing so uses
> code space,
I don't think anyone has complained about the 0.1% of available code
space that these will occupy.
They aren't roadmapped for the BMP, are they?
-- Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://www.ewellic.org http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 06 2009 - 19:31:52 CST