From: Asmus Freytag (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Jan 09 2009 - 15:34:38 CST
On 1/9/2009 1:03 PM, Leo Broukhis wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Asmus Freytag <email@example.com> wrote:
>> If something is expressed as a discrete unit in inline text, and preferably
>> has symbolic or conventionalized use, then, to me, it's passed the most
>> important tests that would put it this side of the fence, when it comes to
>> encoding it in a character set.
> To eventual encoding it in a character set..
That's what I tried to express here. Additional things, like degree of
usage, stability etc. need to be looked at when it comes to a *standard*
character set where there's an expectation that many people will
implement/support it, but what I mentioned are essential aspects of
whether character set encoding is an appropriate technology to address this.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 09 2009 - 15:37:09 CST