From: Kenneth Whistler (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Jan 09 2009 - 15:44:07 CST
> Wouldn't that classify it as "Known script, but insufficient
> information to do a decent job of rough pre-allocation, and/or
> insufficient to know whether a pre-allocation is warranted", and
> therefore not in the roadmap?
Nice try, Leo. But the emoji set is completely enumerated,
in cross-tabular full splendor. So there is plenty of information
to know how to allocate it -- not merely how to pre-allocate
it. In fact the proposal online right now has a fully explicit
listing and exact code point suggestions.
> Or would using Kikakui encoded in PUA in cell phones make it
> immediately eligible for encoding?
Here you go:
Contact them and get started on your business case for adding
Kikakui to their phones.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 09 2009 - 15:45:30 CST