Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy

From: Kenneth Whistler (
Date: Fri Jan 09 2009 - 15:44:07 CST

  • Next message: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Whistler's Conjecture (was: Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy)"

    > Wouldn't that classify it as "Known script, but insufficient
    > information to do a decent job of rough pre-allocation, and/or
    > insufficient to know whether a pre-allocation is warranted", and
    > therefore not in the roadmap?

    Nice try, Leo. But the emoji set is completely enumerated,
    in cross-tabular full splendor. So there is plenty of information
    to know how to allocate it -- not merely how to pre-allocate
    it. In fact the proposal online right now has a fully explicit
    listing and exact code point suggestions.

    > Or would using Kikakui encoded in PUA in cell phones make it
    > immediately eligible for encoding?

    Here you go:

    Contact them and get started on your business case for adding
    Kikakui to their phones.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 09 2009 - 15:45:30 CST