From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Fri Jan 09 2009 - 17:55:27 CST
On 1/9/2009 2:52 PM, André Szabolcs Szelp wrote:
>> Stated bluntly like this, you would effectively rescind the 10th Unicode
>> Design principle.
>>
>> Whenever that principle applies to a set, then non-PUA code points are in
>> order, even if the characters violate some other design principle or the
>> character-glyph model in some ways. That's the whole purpose of having #10.
>>
>
> Asmus, you don't treat the whole set in the current proposal either,
> having the corporate logos... so this also violates #10?
>
In principle, yes. However, the reasons for that exclusion are
essentially legal, and not technical and the precedent is of some standing.
A./
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 09 2009 - 17:57:25 CST