From: André Szabolcs Szelp (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Jan 09 2009 - 16:48:48 CST
2009/1/9 Adam Twardoch <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> In other words, I don't think the question should be "whether" but
> "which ones" to encode.
> Let's ignore, for the moment, that emoji are actually emoji, and just
> treat them as characters that are up for potential encoding. I do think
> that a part of them may not be up to the requirements for ISO/Unicode
> standardization. The ones that are up the requirements should be
> encoded, for others, vendors should use PUA.
This is something I do fully agree with.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 09 2009 - 16:50:10 CST