Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy

From: André Szabolcs Szelp (
Date: Fri Jan 09 2009 - 16:48:48 CST

  • Next message: André Szabolcs Szelp: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"

    2009/1/9 Adam Twardoch <>:
    > In other words, I don't think the question should be "whether" but
    > "which ones" to encode.
    > Let's ignore, for the moment, that emoji are actually emoji, and just
    > treat them as characters that are up for potential encoding. I do think
    > that a part of them may not be up to the requirements for ISO/Unicode
    > standardization. The ones that are up the requirements should be
    > encoded, for others, vendors should use PUA.

    This is something I do fully agree with.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 09 2009 - 16:50:10 CST