From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Jan 09 2009 - 17:07:58 CST
On 9 Jan 2009, at 22:48, André Szabolcs Szelp wrote:
>> Let's ignore, for the moment, that emoji are actually emoji, and just
>> treat them as characters that are up for potential encoding. I do
>> that a part of them may not be up to the requirements for ISO/Unicode
>> standardization. The ones that are up the requirements should be
>> encoded, for others, vendors should use PUA.
> This is something I do fully agree with.
I also agree.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 09 2009 - 17:08:52 CST