Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Fri Jan 09 2009 - 17:07:58 CST

  • Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"

    On 9 Jan 2009, at 22:48, André Szabolcs Szelp wrote:

    >> Let's ignore, for the moment, that emoji are actually emoji, and just
    >> treat them as characters that are up for potential encoding. I do
    >> think
    >> that a part of them may not be up to the requirements for ISO/Unicode
    >> standardization. The ones that are up the requirements should be
    >> encoded, for others, vendors should use PUA.
    > This is something I do fully agree with.

    I also agree.

    Michael Everson *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 09 2009 - 17:08:52 CST