From: Peter Constable (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Jan 10 2009 - 12:39:52 CST
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of firstname.lastname@example.org
> As the proposal stands a number of the emoji are in fact duplicates of
> existing unicode characters - the principle of non duplication has not
> always been applied.
> It is hard to see why one is unified and the other is not.
That's the kind of thing that needs to be evaluated and the reason they've asked for a public review of their draft proposal content. It's not a done deal yet.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 10 2009 - 12:41:33 CST