RE: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy

From: vunzndi@vfemail.net
Date: Sat Jan 10 2009 - 15:40:55 CST

  • Next message: vunzndi@vfemail.net: "RE: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"

    Quoting "Peter Constable" <petercon@microsoft.com>:

    > From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
    > On Behalf Of vunzndi@vfemail.net
    >
    >> I am certain it would be almost impossible to find a person who was
    >> from a country not included in the 10 "flags/localisation symbols" who
    >> would agree the 10 are sufficient.
    >
    > Well, I have not gone to see which countries are included in the ten
    > and found that my country (Canada) is not included, nor are two
    > other countries in which I have at some time resided (Thailand and
    > Mexico). Nonetheless, I see no need to encode additional flags in
    > the UCS.
    >
    > So, your certainly is clearly not well founded.
    >

    Now I know of one exception.

    Accepted my words were not the most accurate they could be.

    John Knightley

    >
    >
    > Peter
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 10 2009 - 15:43:45 CST