From: Michael D. Adams (email@example.com)
Date: Sun Feb 22 2009 - 17:21:18 CST
First, thank you for putting this up. As an (amateur) implementor
this gives me a better feel for what numbers I need to target.
However, it would be nice if you could pick samples to test that might
give a better feel for the performance parameters of normalization.
The "nörmalization" test is good as it shows the performance of the
fast-path. But the "No\u0308rmalization" test doesn't really give a
good feel for performance as the last eleven characters may or may not
have been fast-pathed. Perhaps a few more points varying from
completely unfast-pathable (e.g.
somewhat fast-pathable might be more helpful.
Michael D. Adams
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Mark Davis <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> In response to questions from some people in the W3C, I put together an FAQ
> on NFC normalization, at http://www.macchiato.com/unicode/nfc-faq
> I have some figures on performance and footprint in there as examples; if
> anyone else has figures from other implementations, I'd appreciate them.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 22 2009 - 17:26:25 CST