From: Asmus Freytag (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Feb 23 2009 - 12:42:17 CST
On 2/23/2009 10:01 AM, Mark Davis wrote:
> The worst performance would be (in the 1M character example I've been
> using), something like a base character followed by a list of 999,999
> characters with CCC != 0, sorted by CCC in reverse order. I added a
> note to this effect.
No, the worst case would be the 2M example...
Actually, the problem with such kind of examples is that they don't
speak to what you can realistically expect in non-contrived situations.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 23 2009 - 12:45:23 CST