From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Mon Mar 16 2009 - 06:11:01 CST
On 16 Mar 2009, at 11:46, Julian Bradfield wrote:
> On 2009-03-16, Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com> wrote:
>> On 16 Mar 2009, at 09:35, Julian Bradfield wrote:
>>> For coding purposes, you could probably regard it as a glyphic
>>> variant
>>> of the "calc" rune ᛣ (U+16E3, missing in the font I'm using!).
>> Doesn't Tolkien use that for Z?
>
> No, I don't think so. (Yes, in the Moria runes, but that's
> irrelevant.)
He may do so; there's a table on p. 379 of the Annotated Hobbit which
lists it (and some other things). Will need a bit of research.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 16 2009 - 06:12:57 CST