From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Sun Mar 29 2009 - 12:04:18 CST
Bingo. Nobody assumes letter-for-letter reversible mappings between Latin and some arbitrary script.
Peter
________________________________________
From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [unicode-bounce@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Doug Ewell [doug@ewellic.org]
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 10:16 AM
To: Unicode Mailing List
Subject: Re: Old Hungarian at SC2/WG2
Rick McGowan <rick at unicode dot org> wrote:
>> as in the context of the concurrent use of the script
>> with the Latin script, there especially names written
>> in Latin must be able to be represented uniquely
>> and reversibly in the Old Hungarian script, not
>> confined to names which are inherently Hungarian.
>
> I don't think that has ever been a goal of the Old Hungarian encoding,
> any more than for other scripts.
And even if it were, "uniquely and reversibly" does not necessarily
imply one-to-one correspondence of code points.
-- Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://www.ewellic.org http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 29 2009 - 12:10:18 CST