From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Apr 08 2009 - 07:10:44 CDT
Hans Aberg <haberg at math dot su dot se> wrote:
>>> *) This link overlooks the possibility of using Unicode characters
>>> for English spelling reform.
> This would not be logically correct, because I used some ASCII
> characters. But then normal language usage may not be correct with
> respect to formal.
The point is that "ASCII characters" and "Unicode characters" do not
stand in opposition. ASCII characters are part of Unicode.
-- Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://www.ewellic.org http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 11 2009 - 20:40:52 CDT