From: Peter Constable (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed May 27 2009 - 19:07:11 CDT
By "embedded fonts" I'm sure he meant EOTs and not PDFs. Of course, that can ensure display of default glyphs for characters, but not necessarily correct complex shaping.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Roozbeh Pournader
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 1:14 PM
To: Sergey Malkin
Cc: Unicode Mailing List
Subject: RE: Pb with Unicode Tifinagh with Internet Explorer
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 18:26 +0000, Sergey Malkin wrote:
> And if you want to be really sure text in particular language is
> displayed on any machine, use embedded fonts.
That is a surprising recommendation. "on any machine"?! How many
browsers/platforms do you think support embedded fonts in same format
and with the same level of support for the "complex" rendering rules?
(Unless you mean PDF with embedded fonts...)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 27 2009 - 19:09:48 CDT