From: Roozbeh Pournader (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed May 27 2009 - 19:18:10 CDT
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 17:07 -0700, Peter Constable wrote:
> Of course, that can ensure display of default glyphs for characters,
> but not necessarily correct complex shaping.
That's what I think too.
All of us (in the Unicode community) are trying our best to achieve
interoperability among text rendering engines, but we still have a long
way to go. (We are still changing even the encoding models for some of
the scripts, but that's a different story.)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 27 2009 - 19:21:18 CDT