From: Asmus Freytag (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jun 04 2009 - 09:54:17 CDT
On 6/4/2009 2:13 AM, William_J_G Overington wrote:
> Well, no, because the suggestion of using U+FFFC does have a clue for humans as to what might be meant.
Not really. U+FFFC is supposed to stand on its own in a *text* stream,
with all the data being in *another* stream.
Your parameter passing example has a single text stream.
Despite what you might want to think, U+FFFC is not the "start of object
data marker" that you would like it to be.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 04 2009 - 09:56:25 CDT