From: Kenneth Whistler (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Jul 02 2009 - 19:39:49 CDT
Bill Poser noted:
> There was a point to my comment about North Korean fonts,
> which is that the reason that North Korea has not supplied
> fonts is probably the fact that it just doesn't participate
> in international organizations like Unicode.
Before this discussion wanders too far afield, I'll
provide a little clarification.
The Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (DPRK) has never
participated in or even communicated with the Unicode Consortium.
Its participation has rather been entirely through the
ISO context, specifically in WG2 and the IRG, to make additions
to ISO/IEC 10646. That participation resulted in various
additions of unified CJK ideographs, compatibility CJK
ideographs, and a handful of additional symbols to ISO/IEC 10646.
Such characters end up in the Unicode Standard because
the Unicode Standard is maintained in tight synchrony with
the approval of amendments to ISO/IEC 10646.
The issue now is that the DPRK's active participation in
ISO and WG2 and the IRG was a number of years ago, when
the encoding issues and repertoire were under active
discussion. For quite a few years now, the standardization
officials of the DPRK have not communicated further
with WG2 or its various officers (convenor, rapporteurs, editors).
Fonts used for printing the multicolumn CJK charts for
ISO/IEC 10646 (and by extension the Unicode Standard,
since the two organizations now share chart formats) are
subject to more rigid constraints than fonts used for
other charts in the standard(s), because they must match
the intention of normative sources used by the various
participants in the IRG, as part of the original submissions
of repertoires of CJK characters for unification analysis
It isn't enough that somebody come up with *a* font that
covers all the source glyphs for a particular national
source printed in multi-column format -- it needs to be
certified as correctly matching the original source
WG2 and its editors have rules for all this, and as far as
I know, serious attempts have been made to communicate
with the relevant parties in the DPRK, to let them know
that the DPRK source column will simply not be printed
if the relevant source font is not provided.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 02 2009 - 19:42:21 CDT