From: Christoph Burgmer (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jul 14 2009 - 16:44:47 CDT
Am Dienstag, 14. Juli 2009 schrieb Asmus Freytag:
> On 7/14/2009 8:16 AM, Christoph Burgmer wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 14. Juli 2009 schrieb Michael Everson:
> >> On 14 Jul 2009, at 15:27, Christoph Burgmer wrote:
> >>> http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~uyhc/files/images/p1070462.jpg
> >>> http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~uyhc/files/images/p1070465.jpg
> >>> For me that is clearly a different glyph.
> >> Different from what? To me, it's a zero or an o. It's not a ring since
> >> those are typically monoline.
> > Yes, different from the three initially posted examples.
> I agree.
> What about the other subscripted characters from the first example - it
> would be nice to see them in the second source, if they occur there. Are
> they primes, vertical bars or subscripted digits "1"?
They look pretty similar to the other ones, but clearly handwritten, as it was
already mentioned for the Chinese characters:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 14 2009 - 16:45:38 CDT