From: Phillips, Addison (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Dec 29 2009 - 17:45:24 CST
> > None of these encodings encode the same (full) sequence of code
> points in more than one way,
> Hmmm. Not what I remember about SCSU. The encoder has wide latitude
> picking compression techniques in SCSU, if I remember from my
> implementation. The result would be that two strings that were
> in UTF-16 can become two different byte strings if encoded with two
> different encoders for SCSU.
Picky picky :-). You're correct. I oversimplified my response wrt SCSU. In any case, that's not the reason for SCSU's frowning-upon and it's not a trait that's widely shared with other encodings.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 29 2009 - 17:48:19 CST