From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jan 21 2010 - 03:43:30 CST
On 21 Jan 2010, at 09:16, Raymond Mercier wrote:
> Apparently there were objections because the script they were using
> too much resembled Hebrew...
Sounded to me as though they wanted to restore the earlier script.
Fortunately it has now been encoded (Imperial Aramaic).
> Now I seem to remember a long rather dispute here about just that.
> There is also a short recitation of a prayer in Aramaic.
The unfortunate dispute previously was about Phoenician. Fortunately,
linguistics won out, and the script was encoded.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 21 2010 - 03:46:28 CST