Re: Greek chars encoded twice -- why?

From: Apostolos Syropoulos (ijdt.editor@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Feb 18 2010 - 12:03:38 CST

Next message: verdy_p: "re: Roman numerals"

Previous message: vanisaac@boil.afraid.org: "Re: Greek chars encoded twice -- why?"
Maybe in reply to: Arno Schmitt: "Greek chars encoded twice -- why?"
Next in thread: vanisaac@boil.afraid.org: "Re: Greek chars encoded twice -- why?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>
>
> Finally, just because there are some people using legacy systems, should we
> continue
> supporting something that is wrong?
>
>
> Isn't that the very definition of supporting legacy systems?
>
>
Yes but here is the problem again: Unicode makes some wrong assumptions and
this happens
because some people used wrong things 20 years ago. So should we continue
this way? [You know
there is a magical word called "change" (I bet you are familiar with it ;-)
).]

-- 
Apostolos Syropoulos
366, 28th October Str.
GR-671 00 Xanthi, GREECE

Next message: verdy_p: "re: Roman numerals"
Previous message: vanisaac@boil.afraid.org: "Re: Greek chars encoded twice -- why?"
Maybe in reply to: Arno Schmitt: "Greek chars encoded twice -- why?"
Next in thread: vanisaac@boil.afraid.org: "Re: Greek chars encoded twice -- why?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 18 2010 - 12:04:45 CST