RE: Z with dot below, U+1E93, for Semitic transliteration

From: CE Whitehead (cewcathar@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu May 27 2010 - 10:38:03 CDT

Next message: Leonardo Boiko: "questions about CJK Strokes"

Previous message: Rick McGowan: "IUC 34 - call for participation - deadline extended"
In reply to: Andreas Prilop: "Z with dot below, U+1E93, for Semitic transliteration"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi. Agreed that z with a dot below can be used to transliterate the Arabic script character U+0638;

I do not know Indic romanization and cannot comment on that; however see: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/stone-catend/trip-a.htm which is part of http://homepage.ntlworld.com/stone-catend/trind.htm.

Best,

C. E. Whitehead

cewcathar@hotmail.com
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 18:43:37 +0200
> From: prilop4321@trashmail.net
> To: unicode@unicode.org
> Subject: Z with dot below, U+1E93, for Semitic transliteration
>
> The Unicode Standard 5.2 says for U+1E93 "Latin letter Z with dot below":
>
> Indic transliteration
>
> I think this should be
>
> Semitic transliteration
>
> because "z with dot below" is used to transliterate U+0638.
> I don't know where "z with dot below" occurs in Indic romanization.
>
> --
> From the New World:
> http://www.google.co.uk/search?ie=ISO-8859-2&q=Dvofi%E1k
>

Next message: Leonardo Boiko: "questions about CJK Strokes"
Previous message: Rick McGowan: "IUC 34 - call for participation - deadline extended"
In reply to: Andreas Prilop: "Z with dot below, U+1E93, for Semitic transliteration"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 27 2010 - 10:44:17 CDT